Memo from Dr. H. A. Miley AFOIN-4E4
to Col. G. C. Hoffman AFOIN-4E1, 7 Nov 1956
SUBJECT: Report for Analysis - UFO Reports from CINCUSAFE,
Wiesbaden and Lakenheath, England
TO: AFOIN-4E1
Attn: Col Hoffman |
FROM: AFOIN-4E4 DATE 7
Nov 56 COMMENT NR.3
4E4/Capt G.T.Gregory/ltc 69216
|
- Attached herewith is AIIR-1-56, England (Inclosure #1),
containing pertinent information on the Lakenheath-Bentwaters
sighting which was reported to this Center on 13 August
1956 with a request for immediate evaluation by
Headquarters USAF. It is believed this report is in
response to this Center's request for additional
information (see Inclosure #2).
- On the basis of the information available at the time, it
was our conclusion that the sighting was the result of
anomalous propagation with the possibility of certain
meteoric showers, which were prominent during that
sighting date, a contributing factor.
- Inasmuch as Headquarters USAF has expressed a desire for
an expeditious evaluation regarding this UFO sighting (Inclosure
#3), it is requested that this report be reviewed,
together with the original data, for the purpose of
arriving at a more firm conclusion.
- A rough plot of the three radar and one visual
observation indicate that the sightings cannot be
considered as concurrent with respect to time. (Inclosure
#4). A forty-five minute search of the area by a local
intercept squadron produced no physical evidence of any
unidentified object in the sky.*
- Attched for your information is an evaluation by Dr.
Hynek and Dr. Whipple which represents an approach to the
sighting, primarily from an astronomical and
astrophysical viewpoint from the data available at that
time. It may be of some assistance in your over-all study
of the incident.
HENRY A. MILEY
AFOIN-4E4
6 Incls
- AIIR-1-56, England (U)
- [deleted]
- TI T56-23446-1, 10 Oct56 (S)
- Rough Sketch, UFO Plots (U)
- Memo for Record, 17 Oct 56, T56-24219 (C)
- 6. Memo for Record, 21Sep 56 (U)
[handwritten annotation:]
* Of significance is
the fact that the
direction of the UFOs
travel on the radar
scope was not the
same in any of the
three plots. In fact
there was a wide
divergence in the
three bearings indicated.
[signature deleted]